<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>South Gateway Neighborhood Association</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sgna.us/blog/index.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sgna.us/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 04:10:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Kuebler Improvements</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2010/04/23/kuebler-improvements/</link>
		<comments>http://sgna.us/blog/2010/04/23/kuebler-improvements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cristina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=1655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click here to see the Kuebler Blvd. Improvements Fact Sheet.
Click here to see responses to questions raised at the November 12, 2009 SGNA Meeting.
Click here to see changes currently under [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/KueblerImprovements_FactSheet.pdf">Click here to see the Kuebler Blvd. Improvements Fact Sheet.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Kuebler_Response_to_Questions.pdf">Click here to see responses to questions raised at the November 12, 2009 SGNA Meeting.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://sgna.us/blog/2009/11/29/changes-under-consideration/">Click here to see changes currently under consideration.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sgna.us/blog/2010/04/23/kuebler-improvements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Community Organization</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2010/03/23/neighborhood-harvest-of-salem/</link>
		<comments>http://sgna.us/blog/2010/03/23/neighborhood-harvest-of-salem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cristina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=1602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would you like to help the community and take home free produce? Check out the new community organization, Neighborhood [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Neighborhood-Harvest-logo.jpg"><img src="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Neighborhood-Harvest-logo-300x97.jpg" alt="" title="Neighborhood-Harvest-logo" width="300" height="97" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1603" /></a>You are invited to join a new community organization, Neighborhood Harvest. Our volunteers gather unused fruit from Salem’s backyards, share the bounty with families who are hungry, and take home free produce, grown right here. We seek to create community and strengthen neighborhood friendships, alleviate hunger, create awareness of our abundant edible landscapes, and promote sustainable lifestyles. We are affiliated with Friends of Salem Saturday Market and linked to Marion-Polk Food Share through donations of produce.</p>
<p>We are seeking energetic, responsible volunteers. Sign up to be a harvest leader, neighborhood coordinator or site scout. We’ll show you how to organize a fruit-picking adventure while meeting neighbors and new friends.</p>
<p>To volunteer, contact Katherine at kdaniels@salemharvest.org. Register your tree, vine or berry bush using our online form, or contact Dick at dyates@salemharvest.org. For information visit <a href="http://www.salemharvest.org">www.salemharvest.org</a> or contact Lisa at lclark-burnell@salemharvest.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sgna.us/blog/2010/03/23/neighborhood-harvest-of-salem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Security Surveys</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2010/03/10/free-security-surveys/</link>
		<comments>http://sgna.us/blog/2010/03/10/free-security-surveys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cristina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighborhood Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=1557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Volunteers from the police department are offering to do free security surveys.
If you are interested in having an officer survey your home call the City Crime Prevention Unit at 503-588-6175.
Safety Tip: Dowels in windows need to fit tightly to prevent the window from being opened. A loose dowel can be lifted out!  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Volunteers from the police department are offering to do free security surveys.</strong><br />
If you are interested in having an officer survey your home call the City Crime Prevention Unit at 503-588-6175.</p>
<p><em>Safety Tip: Dowels in windows need to fit tightly to prevent the window from being opened. A loose dowel can be lifted out!  </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sgna.us/blog/2010/03/10/free-security-surveys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What do you think of the proposed apartments?</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2010/02/15/what-do-you-think-of-the-proposed-apartments/</link>
		<comments>http://sgna.us/blog/2010/02/15/what-do-you-think-of-the-proposed-apartments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cristina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apartments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=1408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Click here to see a document submitted by Geoffrey James of Land Design NW that provides a narrative description with a color vicinity map and site map of the proposed apartments to be located south and east of Rainier St South (just south of Davis Road).
This information was presented during the February 11th SGNA General [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/GreenMeadows_thumbnail.jpg"><img src="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/GreenMeadows_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="Green Meadows Apartments" width="226" height="157" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1405" /></a></p>
<p><a href='http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/GREEN-MEADOWS-APARTMENTS.pdf'>Click here</a> to see a document submitted by Geoffrey James of Land Design NW that provides a narrative description with a color vicinity map and site map of the proposed apartments to be located south and east of Rainier St South (just south of Davis Road).</p>
<p>This information was presented during the February 11th SGNA General Meeting.</p>
<p><strong>The Planning Commission is scheduled to hear this proposal on March 2.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sgna.us/blog/2010/02/15/what-do-you-think-of-the-proposed-apartments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lone Oak Final Master Plan</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2010/02/11/lone-oak-final-master-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://sgna.us/blog/2010/02/11/lone-oak-final-master-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cristina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=1542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click here to see the Lone Oak NeighborhoodPark Final Master Plan
Lone Oak Site Plan              Play Area [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Click here to see the Lone Oak NeighborhoodPark Final Master Plan<br />
<a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Lone-Oak-Site-Plan1.pdf">Lone Oak Site Plan</a>              <a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Play-Area-Detail1.pdf">Play Area Details</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sgna.us/blog/2010/02/11/lone-oak-final-master-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wes Bennett Survey Results</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/11/29/wes-bennett-survey-results/</link>
		<comments>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/11/29/wes-bennett-survey-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cristina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=1184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is a visual representation of the results submitted to the City of Salem. Click on the image for a larger view.

Option 1
Widen Reed Ln by 10 ft
Allow on-street parking on both sides of street
15 to 16 parking spaces

Option 2
Widen east side of Reed Ln by 7ft
10 to 11 parking spaces

Option 3
Widen south side of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below is a visual representation of the results submitted to the City of Salem. Click on the image for a larger view.</p>
<p><a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/SurveyResults.jpg"><img src="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/SurveyResults-300x207.jpg" alt="SurveyResults" title="SurveyResults" width="300" height="207" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1185" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Option 1</strong><br />
Widen Reed Ln by 10 ft<br />
Allow on-street parking on both sides of street<br />
15 to 16 parking spaces<br />
<a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option1.jpg"><img src="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option1-232x300.jpg" alt="Wes Bennett Option 1" title="Wes Bennett Option 1" width="232" height="300" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1000" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Option 2</strong><br />
Widen east side of Reed Ln by 7ft<br />
10 to 11 parking spaces<br />
<a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option2.jpg"><img src="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option2-256x300.jpg" alt="Wes Bennett Option 2" title="Wes Bennett Option 2" width="256" height="300" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1001" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Option 3</strong><br />
Widen south side of Baxter Rd by 19ft<br />
35 parking spaces<br />
<a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option3.jpg"><img src="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option3-252x300.jpg" alt="Wes Bennett Option 3" title="Wes Bennett Option 3" width="252" height="300" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1002" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Option 4</strong><br />
Mark out the on-street parking spaces<br />
Park side or both sides<br />
Mark loading zone for drop-off and pick-up<br />
<a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option4.jpg"><img src="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option4-231x300.jpg" alt="Wes Bennett Option 4" title="Wes Bennett Option 4" width="231" height="300" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1003" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Option 5</strong><br />
Mark 5ft yellow curb next to driveways to improve driveway access<br />
<a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option5.jpg"><img src="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option5-232x300.jpg" alt="Wes Bennett Option 5" title="Wes Bennett Option 5" width="232" height="300" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1004" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Option 6</strong><br />
No on-street parking in the vicinity of the Park<br />
No parking hours limited (ie 10am to 6pm)<br />
<a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option6.jpg"><img src="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option6-231x300.jpg" alt="Wes Bennett Option 6" title="Wes Bennett Option 6" width="231" height="300" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1005" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Option 7</strong><br />
Install Residential Permit Parking District<br />
Residents could park with permit<br />
Visitors allowed to park for 90min once per day<br />
<a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option7.jpg"><img src="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option7-232x300.jpg" alt="Wes Bennett Option 7" title="Wes Bennett Option 7" width="232" height="300" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1006" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Option 7a</strong><br />
Install No Parking except for Residential Parking Permit<br />
Residents and visitors can only park if they have a permit<br />
<a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option7a.jpg"><img src="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option7a-232x300.jpg" alt="Option7a" title="Option7a" width="232" height="300" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1064" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Option 8</strong><br />
Install splash fountain at Woodmansee<br />
Has 102 pkg spaces<br />
Has restrooms<br />
<a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option8.jpg"><img src="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Option8-300x254.jpg" alt="Wes Bennet Option 8" title="Wes Bennet Option 8" width="300" height="254" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1007" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Option 9</strong><br />
Move splash fountain from Wes Bennett Park and install at Woodmansee Park</p>
<p><strong>Option 10</strong><br />
Restrict hours of splash fountain at Wes Bennett Park</p>
<p><strong>Option 11</strong><br />
Keep existing signing (No parking Wes Bennett Park Users)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/11/29/wes-bennett-survey-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changes Under Consideration</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/11/29/changes-under-consideration/</link>
		<comments>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/11/29/changes-under-consideration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cristina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=1167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because of the widening of Kuebler Blvd., there will be some changes in certain areas of SGNA during the next few months. Property has been or will be purchased along the Kuebler Blvd. right of way which is needed in order to widen that beltline and meet state and federal requirements.
One place under consideration is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because of the widening of Kuebler Blvd., there will be some changes in certain areas of SGNA during the next few months. Property has been or will be purchased along the Kuebler Blvd. right of way which is needed in order to widen that beltline and meet state and federal requirements.</p>
<p>One place under consideration is the entrance through the fence just west of Lone Oak Rd. which provides access to Kuebler Blvd. from Khyber Ct.  (See pictures below).</p>
<p>If this entrance remains and becomes a part of the widening process, a concrete incline would have to be built with no more than a 7% drop down to Kuebler.  The current drop is 3 feet.  Because of the 7% requirement, this new concrete incline would have to be up to 60 feet wide.  This change would be required because of A.D.A. laws. </p>
<p>If this entrance is eliminated, some adjacent personal property would not have to be purchased, and the City would save approximately $35,000.  It has been suggested that walking or riding around the small block, adjacent to that entrance, is a short walking distance and that many people already use that alternative.</p>
<p>If you have any concerns or disagreements with the idea of eliminating this entrance, please feel free to contact SGNA and/or come to our December 10th meeting.  Our Transportation Committee will be considering this issue over the next few weeks.</p>
<p>- Pat O&#8217;Dell</p>
<div id="attachment_1173" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/P1010007.JPG"><img src="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/P1010007-300x225.jpg" alt="Looking from Khyber Ct. through the entrance toward Kuebler Blvd." title="P1010007" width="300" height="225" class="size-medium wp-image-1173" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Looking from Khyber Ct. through the entrance toward Kuebler Blvd.</p></div>
<div id="attachment_1174" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/P1010008.JPG"><img src="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/P1010008-300x225.jpg" alt="Looking from Khyber Ct. through the entrance toward Kuebler Blvd." title="P1010008" width="300" height="225" class="size-medium wp-image-1174" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Looking from Khyber Ct. through the entrance toward Kuebler Blvd.</p></div>
<div id="attachment_1169" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/P1010009.JPG"><img src="http://sgna.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/P1010009-300x225.jpg" alt="Looking up toward Khyber from Kuebler" title="P1010009" width="300" height="225" class="size-medium wp-image-1169" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Looking up toward Khyber from Kuebler</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/11/29/changes-under-consideration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What would you like to see discussed?</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/04/08/discussed/</link>
		<comments>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/04/08/discussed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cristina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outreach & Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All residents, property owners, business licensees, and representatives of nonprofit organizations who reside or conduct business within the boundaries of the association are welcome to post suggestions and feedback here.  
This an open public forum for the exchange of information, ideas and opinions. Censorship is undesirable; Civil discourse is required. Please, always be courteous [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All residents, property owners, business licensees, and representatives of nonprofit organizations who reside or conduct business within the boundaries of the association are welcome to post suggestions and feedback here.  </p>
<p>This an open public forum for the exchange of information, ideas and opinions. Censorship is undesirable; Civil discourse is required. Please, always be courteous and respectful. We won’t always agree, but we can agree to disagree is a neighborly fashion.</p>
<p>Anybody can post to this page. Simply type your post in the text box below and click on the “submit comment” button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/04/08/discussed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Salem City Council allow development of the former Battle Creek property?</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/04/07/develop-battle-creek-property/</link>
		<comments>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/04/07/develop-battle-creek-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cristina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battle Creek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battle Creek Basin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Below is the wording posted on the city council website regarding this issue.  Public testimony is now closed, but written comments are still accepted.  Please post your comments regarding this issue. 
7.  PUBLIC HEARINGS (b)  
Council Review of Planning Commission Decision for Comprehensive PlanChange / Neighborhood Change / Zone Change 08-15 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="more-408"></span><br />
Below is the wording posted on the city council website regarding this issue.  Public testimony is now closed, but written comments are still accepted.  Please post your comments regarding this issue. </p>
<p>7.  PUBLIC HEARINGS (b)  </p>
<p>Council Review of Planning Commission Decision for Comprehensive PlanChange / Neighborhood Change / Zone Change 08-15 for property located at 6161 Commercial Street SE – Ward 4 – Councilor Sullivan – South Gateway (CD)</p>
<p>Recommended Action:  Staff recommends that City Council affirm the decision of the Planning Commission to approve the request to change the Salem Area Comprehensive Plan Map designation from “Parks, Open Space and Outdoor Recreation” to “Commercial,” “Multi-Family Residential,” and “Single-Family Residential” and the zone district from PA (Public Amusement) to CR (Commercial Retail – 4.67 acres), RM1 (Multiple Family Residential – 10.59 acres), and RS (Single Family Residential – 26.77 acres); and to amend the Liberty-Boone Neighborhood Plan map from “Parks, Open Space” to “Single Family,” Multifamily,” and “Commercial Retail” for property located at 6161 Commercial Street SE.  Approximately 2.27 acres of the site will remain designated “Parks, Open Space and Outdoor Recreation,” zoned PA, and maintain its current map designation on the Neighborhood Plan Map.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cityofsalem.net/MeetingAgendas/default.aspx?InstanceID=20090406&#038;Paged=Next&#038;p_StartTimeUTC=20090210T023000Z&#038;View={52864740-D108-4975-838B-EE955697F8B5}">Click here to see the City of Salem page showing this information.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/04/07/develop-battle-creek-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Posting Guidelines</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/04/01/posting-guidelines/</link>
		<comments>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/04/01/posting-guidelines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cristina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This an open public forum for the exchange of information, ideas and opinions. Censorship is undesirable; Civil discourse is required. Please, always be courteous and respectful. We won&#8217;t always agree, but we can agree to disagree is a neighborly fashion.

Anybody can post a comment or opinion. Simply click on the &#8220;comments&#8221; link at the bottom [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This an open public forum for the exchange of information, ideas and opinions. Censorship is undesirable; Civil discourse is required. Please, always be courteous and respectful. We won&#8217;t always agree, but we can agree to disagree is a neighborly fashion.<br />
<span id="more-394"></span><br />
Anybody can post a comment or opinion. Simply click on the &#8220;comments&#8221; link at the bottom of the article or news item you wish to respond to.</p>
<p>Members of the SGNA Board, local elected officials, and designated committee representatives have been granted privileges to post articles and news items to this site.</p>
<p>Elected officers of SGNA have administrative authority to edit articles and news items, as well as the responsibility to edit or delete public comments which are considered grossly inappropriate or violate any of the following prohibitions:</p>
<p>1. No foul language or profanity allowed.<br />
2. No personal attacks against any individual or group.<br />
3. Comments from local elected officials or candidates for public office are welcome and encouraged, but this site is not intended for political campaign purposes.<br />
4. This site is not intended to serve as a vehicle for commercial advertising; but PR for local area events and non-profit organizations is welcome.<br />
5. Non sequitur remarks or comments not relating to the corresponding posted article or news item may be deleted.</p>
<p>Other rules may be added as deemed necessary by SGNA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/04/01/posting-guidelines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
